How many analysts follow your closest comparables, which firms they sit at, and precisely where you stand against that benchmark. Investors judge your coverage relative to your peers, so we measure it the same way.
We shortlist analysts whose sector remit, market-cap range and publishing record suggest a real fit, and set aside the ones who would never realistically initiate on a business like yours.
We use our relationships across the research community to put your name in front of those analysts and make the case for you. This is the part most companies cannot do for themselves.
Analysts need a business they can model. We review your disclosure, segment reporting and guidance through their eyes and flag what makes you harder to pick up than you need to be.
Which sponsored conferences and non-deal roadshows actually put you in the room with the analysts you want, and which are simply an expensive week away from the business.
Coverage is lost as often as it is won, usually through analyst moves or budget cuts rather than anything you did. We monitor for those signals and help you respond before a name drops off the list.
Funds that require published estimates before initiating a position cannot consider you, and most will never explain that is the reason.
Someone moved firms or the sector remit was redrawn, and the count quietly dropped without anyone establishing whether it can be replaced.
The absolute number looks acceptable until it sits beside comparable businesses, at which point the gap starts to explain your valuation.
We benchmark your coverage against your peer group and establish why any previous coverage was lost.
Analysts are screened on sector remit, cap range and publishing history, leaving names with a realistic chance of initiating.
We make the case for you across our research relationships, and prepare your team for the conversations that follow.
We track analyst moves and research budget signals so a name coming off the list is something you see in advance.